Computer Vision for Artists and Designers
Computers cannot think as humans do, at least not yet. Computers simply gather input and process it. So as long as computers can gather visual data and process it, then there's no reason it can be used to create artwork. Have a video capture of anything, paintings, faces, water bottles, then a computer could gather the digital input and basically regurgitate it into a completely new image. What the new image would look like is entirely up to the programmer. It could either an altered version of the original image or something abstract.
Top 15 Criteria That Define Interactive or New Media Art
As predictable as computers are in the way that information, humans actually have some of the same tendencies, especially when it comes to approaching a new, unfamiliar technology. When interactive media is shown to people, they have an almost specific response, following a very predictable pattern of first recognizing the way the input is gathered to trying to undermine it to then belittling it (sometimes). It has a comedic
Interactive Art
The top 15 criteria already sort of defined what interactive art is, but this wikipedia basically states that interactive is anything that an audience can participate in influencing. The Mona Lisa for instance is not interactive because the audience cannot alter the image short of actually throwing paint on it. However, a program that changed the intensity of the Mona Lisa's smile based on the audience's own smile could be called interactive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment